Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro compara
While Vivo’s X200 series has two consummate contenders for flagship status, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra, both of which boast cutting-edge technology that appeals to slightly different preferences. This comparison will involve an exhaustive study of both phones’ camera capabilities, performance speeds, and any other important comparisons by which one may determine the victor. Whether you are a photography enthusiast, performance junkie, or someone wanting the best all-round phone, this blog has the solution for you.
Introduction
The Vivo X200 Pro and X200 Ultra are premium smartphones meant to dazzle. They are equipped with state-of-the-art specifications and most recent features and compete against each other in Vivo’s flagship lineup. What makes the difference? We will consider the various aspects, including design, display, performance, camera, battery, software, and value assessment, with special regard to the camera and speed highlighted in the title. Let’s view the details of these two phones in a royal face-off and see what comes on top.
Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro Design and Build
Interesting. Matched with sleek and exquisite designs, the X200 Pro and X200 Ultra certainly come with subtle but noteworthy differences.
- Weight: The X200 Pro weighs 228 g, while the X200 Ultra weighs 229 g. The difference is negligible but every gram matters when it comes to prolonged comfort.
- Dimensions: The Pro has the smaller dimensions of 76 mm width by 162.4 mm height and 8.2 mm thickness. The X200 Ultra, however, is bigger, having full dimensions of 76.8 mm in width, 163.1 mm in height, and 8.7 mm in thickness, which, in some sense, can be considered a hindrance for one-handed usability.
- Water resistance: Both devices are waterproof but do not state anything about their IP rating in the specs; in a world where everything moves so quickly, this adds to durability against splashes, and possibly, even submersibles.
- Volume: The X200 Pro is contained in a volume of about 101.21 cm³, while the X200 Ultra has 108.98 cm³, which indicates a little bit bigger footprint.
Conclusion: The X200 Pro slightly wins here for those with a preference for smaller and lighter devices, while the X200 Ultra takes сюда larger.er size might appeal to users who don’t mind a bit of extra heft for potentially enhanced features.
Table of Contents
Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro Display
No great cell phone is complete without the display, and undoubtedly both models offer the best in terms of display presentation with their OLED/AMOLED technology.
- Screen Size: The other difference would be that while the X200 Pro is equipped with a 6.78-inch display, the X200 Ultra goes even further with a whopping 6.82-inch measurement. It may not be a giant leap, but even for media aficionados, such a difference can be quite apparent.
- Resolution: The X200 Pro is at 1260×2800, which is near 452 ppi, while the X200 Ultra has 1440×3168, which is sharper at 510 ppi. The higher the pixel density, the crisper the details; hence the Ultra is more favorable for games and video.
- Brightness: Both would reach a maximum of 4500 nits, thus making its visage clearer even under bright sunlight.
- Refresh Rate: High refresh rates are usually found on flagship phones of this nature (say, 120Hz or more), so smooth scrolling and animation are expected, although this was not stated.
Conclusion: The X200 Ultra takes the cake on this as it has a larger Higher Resolution Display, great for immersive experiences. The X200 Pro is no slouch, though, and its slightly smaller size might suit those who prioritize portability.
Read more
OnePlus 13s Leaked Benchmarks Reveal Flagship Powerhouse
Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro Performance (Speed)
Speed is the flagship phone’s first strongest selling point, and the X200 Pro and the X200 Ultra surely house power inside them.
- RAM: Both come with the 16GB RAM that offers seamless app and gaming multitasking with snappy performance.
- Storage: The X200 Pro brings a storage capacity of 512GB, while the X200 Ultra doubles that to 1024GB (1TB). This capacity is game-changing for anyone keeping hefty files like 4K videos, not to mention huge app libraries.
- GPU: The Immortalis G925 drives the X200 Pro while Adreno 830 is fitted into the Ultra. While both are considered the best in class GPUs, the precise performance difference is quite unclear and remains unknown without specific benchmarks.
- Benchmark: The X200 Pro registers a record score of 2,880,558 out of 3,000,000 possible points in AnTuTu, which is a little bit more than the X200 Ultra, which scored 2,819,127 in AnTuTu. Other benchmarks (e.g., 3DMark Wild Life: 18,593 for Pro vs. unknown for Ultra) can also paint a picture of how the Pro has a slight edge, but there would likely be really small differences in the real-world situation.
Conclusion: Benchmark scores tend to sway slightly to the X200 Pro, yet the great storage capacity of the X200 Ultra tends to shift the scales toward the practical advantage of power.
Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro Camera
Photography is the shining point of the X200 series, with both phones having fascinating camera systems.
- Main camera: The two share the same triple set of 200-megapixel, 50-megapixel, and 50-megapixel sensors, which are probably for wide, ultra-wide, and telephoto arrangements, hence providing great amount of detail, as well as flexibility.
- Features: Both have multi-lenses, which apparently feature optical image stabilization too, such that images and video are sharp and steady. Differences in software or other features of interest (e.g., night mode, zoom capabilities) are not mentioned, but both are likely to perform acceptably.
- User Reviews: One review says that the camera is “the best smartphone camera” when compared to rivals like Samsung S25 Ultra and iPhone 15 Pro Max, which in turn points to top performance for both models.
Conclusion: A draw; both phones share the same camera hardware and in the absence of specified differences in software capabilities, will rate equally in terms of photography.phy enthusiasts. Real-world testing might reveal nuances, but on paper, they’re photo powerhouses.
Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro Battery and Charging
Battery and charge speed can make or break a phone experience, and both aspects offer good things in this specific device.
- Battery Capacity: The full day power of 6000mAh of the X200 Pro while nothing is mentioned for the X200 Ultra for being an ‘Ultra’ model. It likely has the same or bigger capacity.
- Charging Speed: Both of them have 90W fast charging, which is ideal for filling the battery quickly. The X200 Ultra also bumps up its wireless charging to 40W (vs 30W on Pro), which is nice for some extra cable-free convenience.
- Wireless Features: Both gadgets provide reverse wireless charging to allow you to charge other devices. It’s simply that the Ultra has a higher wireless speed, so charging might be better.
Conclusion: For the crown of X200 Ultra fast wireless charging; however, the X200 Pro’s provided 6000mAh capacity seems to be a very strong contender. The Ultra is better if you’re the wireless charging sort.
Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro Software and Features
Software is good to improve one’s hardware experience: both the devices run on the latest Android.
- OS: Both come with Android 15, featuring all the latest features and security updates, plus Vivo’s custom skin (probably Funtouch OS/OriginOS).
- Additional features: Both boast of 5G and dual SIM support (Pro also mentions a single SIM), along with Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, USB 3.2 and NFC; the ultimate flagship standards for connectivity and convenience.
- Unique attributes: Noted is on-device machine learning, hinting to AI improvements on photos, performance or battery management.
Verdict: This is yet another tie. Both phones are built on the same software and features, with nothing really setting them apart from the other.
Vivo X200 Ultra vs X200 Pro Price and Value
vivo X200 Pro 5G Smartphone
|16G+1TB|
Vivo X200 Ultra is not available on amazon now.
Conclusion: Which One Wins?
Which phone is the best? It really depends on your priorities.
- Vivo X200 Pro: a compact smartphone that slightly boasts higher benchmark scores and potential better value. Perfect for those wanting a flagship that performs well without extra bulk or cost.
- Vivo X200 Ultra: Proven superiority because of its super-sized, higher-definition display, a monstrous 1TB storage, and a faster charge via wireless connectivity. For power users looking for the highest level of usage experience.
Both stand on the same level concerning speed as well as quality of the camera they possess, making them neck-and-neck in the vital aspects as per the title. If your priority is photography and performance, then any will do. But, for the edge in “more” — display, storage, and charging — the Vivo X200 Ultra wins overall. Choose the X200 Pro if you want the advantage of portability and affordability; the X200 Ultra is your choice if you’re after the definitive flagship package.
What about you? Share your thoughts!